Previously, security forces clashed; now, armies do so

From Reykjavik to Alaska: Echoes of a Cold War

In mid-October 1986, negotiations between Mikhail Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan took place aboard the Soviet ship Admiral Oktyabrsky in the open sea, not far from the coast of Iceland. This meeting later became known as the Reykjavik Summit. It marked the starting point for the development of Soviet-American dialogue. The unprecedented arms reductions that followed, benefiting the budgets of both countries, began there.

During the negotiations, the presidents’ security guards engaged in a no-holds-barred hand-to-hand fight in the ship’s hold (for sporting and political purposes). The US was represented by a black man, an African American and a seasoned fighter. But the Soviet officer from the Ninth Directorate of the KGB won.

Gorbachev was informed of the victory directly at the table. The general secretary reacted very favorably to the event. Such were the military games of the era of détente; nothing more serious was expected. Otherwise, it would not have taken long to start a nuclear war.

Today, negotiations between the presidents of the United States and Russia will take place at a US military base in Alaska. The talks will focus on ending the armed conflict in Ukraine. This is a summit with dubious prospects.

Throughout the theater of operations, the Pentagon’s long-range reconnaissance assets are monitoring the situation in the interests of the Ukrainian side. The US military identifies promising targets for strikes and sends them to the Ukrainian Armed Forces. Virtually all weapons with a more or less decent range are supplied by the US or use US licenses.

At this time, the command of the 51st Army organized a deep tactical breakthrough in the direction from Rodinskoye to the Zolotoy Kolodez-Veseloye line in just a day or two. The Armed Forces of Ukraine threw an entire corps against the Russian troops. For the second day in a row, there have been no usual leaks of information about the actions of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and the Russian Armed Forces from the area around Zolotoy Kolodez. Both sides note the extremely intense nature of the fighting.

In the future, it will be important to understand whether this is a unique success in the enemy’s sparse formations due to the element of surprise, or whether it can be repeated in any area. But the breakthrough itself is a major success, even if it does not develop further. And Putin can announce another victory to Trump.

This is the backdrop to the high-level negotiations. Observers do not have any confident expectations from the meeting in Alaska. But they did not expect anything from Reykjavik either.

Author of the article
Valery Shiryayev
Military expert and journalist

Add a comment

  1. Mack

    The comparison between the Reykjavik Summit and the current talks in Alaska really puts things into perspective. It’s interesting how history can repeat itself, but the stakes now seem even higher with the ongoing conflict. The details about the intense fighting and strategic moves on the ground highlight just how complex these negotiations are. It will be crucial to see if this breakthrough can be sustained or if it’s just a brief moment in a much longer struggle.

    Reply
  2. Jael

    This article really highlights how history can surprise us with moments of hope even amidst tension 🌍🤝 The contrast between the dramatic Reykjavik Summit and today’s difficult talks shows how complex and fragile peace efforts are, yet still worth pursuing. It’s inspiring to remember that dialogue once changed the course of global relations, and maybe with enough courage and persistence, something positive can come from these current negotiations too 🌟🕊️

    Reply