The army buys everything it wears. They buy not only shoes and uniforms, the rapid wear and tear of which at the front does not allow them to fit into the long terms of use according to the rear documents. It is enough to type in the search “helmet/armor vest/ sight/ thermal imager to buy” and you will immediately jump out a sea of commercial offers for a lot of money.
The people’s military-industrial complex that Putin and Belousov talked so much about is selling its drones and electronic warfare equipment directly to the military. Businesses get tired of waiting for the Defense Ministry to accept their drones or body armor for procurement through a long procedure and put it all up on marketplaces. For the most part, all goods belong to civilian or mixed categories.
But there are among the ads and purely military, “decommissioned” devices, which can not be in civilian circulation. Since the troops are not provided with front-line transportation as needed, the formations buy or receive civilian cars from volunteers. And they buy spare parts for them out of their allowance.
In the Israeli army, the treasury reimburses the boots bought by parents for a soldier. In Russia and Ukraine it does not. And everything else is not compensated either. As a result, at a new round of historical development of the RF Armed Forces and the AFU quickly emerged and became an integral part of the military machine figures of the past – marquettes.
According to Ozhegov’s Dictionary MARKITANT, a, m. In the 18th-19th centuries: a merchant of edibles, drinks and various small goods in the army on a campaign.
There were fabulous times when confectioners and barbers were found in the army of Louis XIV. Over time, along with the men, many ladies went into the marquettes. They obeyed military regulations and took uniforms. The Germans in the 19th century had one marquis with an assistant and two paired wagons per battalion. In the Imperial Army of Russia marquettes appeared according to the statute of 1716. Since 1890 they were under the control of the commandant of the headquarters.
Everything is back. As 200 years ago, the treasury supplies the soldiers with rifles and helmets. Everything above the norms is purchased with their own money. Only now the marquis trades through Ozon, Wildberries and Avito. Food delivery to the trenches in some areas is also organized, with a risk premium for the courier.
Ukraine is traditionally considered a weak state in Russia. There, the sale of high-quality body armor to soldiers instead of weak government vests does not surprise anyone. But according to the many stories of front-line soldiers, Russia differs little in this respect.
As someone who’s into prepping, I’ve noticed a lot of military-grade gear becoming more accessible online. It’s a double-edged sword—it helps individuals prepare, but it also shows how underfunded some military operations are.
I’ve been following this trend for years. Online stores are a lifesaver for soldiers and survival enthusiasts alike. The demand for tactical gear is only going to grow as conflicts become more unpredictable.
This is a fascinating take on how e-commerce is reshaping war logistics. It’s crazy to think that soldiers are now shopping for survival gear the same way we shop for groceries!
This issue raises an important question: if soldiers are buying their own gear, how reliable is the equipment provided by governments? It seems like a major gap in military logistics.
It’s heartbreaking to see soldiers having to spend their own money on protective gear. Governments should prioritize their safety—it’s the least they can do for those risking their lives.
This article really highlights the struggles modern soldiers face. It’s shocking that in some cases, soldiers have to buy their own gear. Governments need to step up and ensure proper supplies for their troops!
Trump’s trade war strategy feels like walking a tightrope. 🌍⚖️ The potential for a global recession is real, but could this also be a power move to secure U.S. dominance? Time will tell. ⏳📉
This article really highlights how much soldiers rely on their own resources and private markets to get essential gear. It’s surprising and somewhat concerning to see that front-line troops have to buy things like body armor and boots themselves, especially when these items are so critical for their safety. The comparison with historical marquettes shows how some practices never fully disappear, just change form over time. It makes me think about the challenges military personnel face beyond just combat, including financial and logistical burdens that are not often talked about openly.
Oh wow, so soldiers are basically running their own eBay shops now? 😂 Nothing says modern warfare like buying your own armor and drone gadgets off the internet while waiting for the government to catch up. I guess if Louis XIV had a Wildberries subscription, history would’ve been way more stylish 👑🛒💥. Here’s to hoping the next frontline update includes a fast shipping option with gift wrapping! 🎁💣
This really highlights how much soldiers have to rely on their own resources beyond what the military provides, which is kind of shocking. The fact that something as essential as body armor or even boots isn’t fully covered by the state and people have to buy them from marketplaces feels like a step back in time. It also makes you think about the challenges these troops face not just on the battlefield but even in getting the basic gear needed for safety. The comparison with older military practices and other countries adds an interesting perspective too. Definitely makes you appreciate the complexity behind military logistics and support 👀🪖
It’s fascinating to see how history repeats itself in modern times, especially with the resurgence of marquettes who now operate through online marketplaces instead of traditional campaign wagons. The practical reality of soldiers having to buy their own essential gear because official supplies fall short really highlights gaps in military logistics that I hadn’t fully considered before. It makes you wonder how many other aspects of frontline life rely heavily on personal resources and ingenuity rather than institutional support. The comparison with the Israeli army’s reimbursement policies is striking and underscores how different military cultures handle the welfare of their soldiers. This glimpse into the realities behind the battlefield underscores the complexity of modern warfare logistics beyond just tactics and combat.
It is striking how history has a way of repeating itself, sometimes in the most unexpected forms. The idea that soldiers now have to rely on marketplaces and even volunteer efforts to obtain equipment and necessities, much like merchants in past centuries, reveals a deeply human aspect of military life that official reports often overlook. This blend of old and new, where modern technology like drones intersects with age-old practices of personal initiative and commerce on the front lines, makes one reflect on the enduring complexity of war beyond the battlefield. It raises questions about the responsibility of the state toward those it sends to fight and the resilience required by individuals to adapt within such systems. The human element remains central: despite technological advances and changing times, the practical realities faced by soldiers echo stories from centuries ago, highlighting both vulnerability and ingenuity in equal measure.