Peskov: Russia does not object to Ukraine’s accession to the EU as it is not a military union

Peskov: Russia does not object to Ukraine’s accession to the EU as it is not a military union

“This is the sovereign right of any country. We are talking about economic integration processes. Here, of course, no one can dictate anything to another country, and we are not going to do so <…> But a completely different position, of course, on issues related to security, defense and military alliances. We have a different approach there, and it is well known to everyone,” Russian presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.

At the same time, Moscow will observe the discussion on the creation of a unified EU army, as “the EU has not had any defense joint projects so far.”

Peskov also reminded that Vladimir Putin is ready to negotiate with Vladimir Zelensky, but it is important to take into account the legal aspects – “taking into account the reality that Zelensky’s legitimacy can be challenged”.

Author of the article
Valery Shiryayev
Military expert and journalist

Add a comment

  1. BalletQuest

    It’s fascinating how the idea of economic integration is treated as untouchable while security and military alliances remain a battleground of competing narratives. The insistence that no one can dictate economic choices sounds more like a selective principle when contrasted with the firm stance on defense cooperation. Also, the claim about Zelensky’s legitimacy feels like a calculated political jab rather than a genuine invitation for dialogue. It all seems to reveal more about power plays than any real desire for mutual understanding.

    Reply
  2. Rakan

    Interesting how economic integration is all about sovereignty and respect, but when it comes to military stuff, it suddenly becomes a whole different game. Watching the EU try to build an army sounds like a plot twist nobody asked for. Also, that little reminder about Zelensky’s legitimacy feels like diplomacy with extra drama 🍿🤔.

    Reply
  3. Zahraa

    The dynamics between economic integration and military alliances are always so complex, and it’s fascinating to see how differently countries approach these issues. The idea of a unified EU army has always seemed ambitious to me, and it’s interesting that Moscow is watching closely but remains skeptical. It really shows how intertwined politics and security are, and how much depends on trust and legitimacy in negotiations. 🌍

    Reply
  4. Kymani

    Interesting how economic integration is everyone’s favorite game, but try to bring up security and suddenly it’s a whole different world 🕵️‍♂️. Also, the EU army is still just a “maybe someday” idea, while the legal gymnastics around legitimacy sound like a plot twist in a political soap opera 🎭. Keeps things entertaining at least!

    Reply
  5. Kaysie

    Watching politicians dance around serious topics like a cautious cat avoiding a puddle is honestly more entertaining than any TV show 😄

    Reply
  6. Ofelia

    The distinction made between economic integration and military alliances is quite clear and highlights the complexity of international relations. It’s interesting how Moscow is open to negotiations yet emphasizes legal legitimacy as a crucial factor. This stance shows the ongoing challenges in balancing sovereignty, security, and diplomacy. Watching how the idea of a unified EU army develops will definitely add another layer to regional security dynamics. 🤔🌍

    Reply
  7. Ziya

    It’s fascinating how the language of diplomacy hides so much tension. Claiming respect for sovereignty while simultaneously warning about security and defense issues feels like a thin veil over deeper strategic intentions. The idea that Zelensky’s legitimacy can be challenged is a provocative stance that raises more questions than answers about what kind of negotiations are truly possible when trust is already in doubt. Observing the EU’s defense discussions while dismissing their previous efforts also seems like a convenient way to undermine their progress without offering any constructive alternatives. This kind of rhetoric doesn’t inspire confidence in peaceful resolutions but rather highlights the fragile and complicated nature of international relations today.

    Reply
  8. Marcell

    So fascinating how sovereignty means one thing when it suits the speaker and something else when it doesn’t 🙄. Watching from the sidelines while talking about unity and defense sounds like the ultimate strategy—sit back and criticize but never actually participate. And the bit about Zelensky’s legitimacy? Classic deflection to avoid real dialogue. Keep talking circles while the rest of the world moves on 🚀🎭.

    Reply