Drones became the main weapon of the NWO almost instantly. In the trenches, where it is a matter of hourly survival, they took their place in just a few months. In the headquarters of the Russian Armed Forces, the process of comprehension lasts not for months, but for years: UAVs have not yet been singled out as a separate type of troops, despite the decisions made by Belousov.
Even when uncrewed boats (of American design, as we now know) started sinking ships in the Black Sea and trouble was knocking at the gates, the fleet command did not get around to putting operators on the crews who could detect Maguras two miles away from the air.
The incident in Murmansk demonstrates that this is a universal law of the Russian power bureaucracy. On the evening of March 30, a 44-year-old local resident opened fire on a patrol-post service crew from the roof of building No. 10 on Kola Avenue. In the course of the operation fighters of Murmansk OMON “Bear” and SOBR “Wolverine” stormed the roof, the shooter was seriously wounded, there is no threat to security.
Note that on the 14th floor, where the criminal was located, the drone of video reconnaissance of the police climbed up. Getting the details right is half the success of the operation. The cameraman’s camera footage is an invaluable innovation.
But so far it has not occurred to anyone that it is enough to create a combat drone with firearms for such cases. Such devices are now a must-have
in the kit of any special forces unit on an alert. And to surround an inadequate citizen with weapons should be four devices at once, it will allow to take him out of the battle without even killing. No storm troopers will have to rush in under fire.
The NWO has more than enough experienced operators who can take a photo of a criminal in a car (like a carjacker) through the windshield at high speed with no problem. They can fly into a bank and gather complete information on hostages and raiders in seconds. And Special Forces fighters in front of the Crocus City Hall building would not have to wait for an hour for a command from firefighters and their own superiors – drones sent to the building would have assessed the situation and saved many lives long before the assault, prepared according to the rules and regulations of the past era.
We, along with the generals, did not notice that a new era had arrived.
This article hits the nail on the head—drones are reshaping everything from military strategy to police tactics. But we need better training programs for operators to truly unlock their potential.
Law enforcement agencies should embrace drones more actively. The ability to assess situations in seconds, especially in urban environments, is a game-changer for public safety.
Great article! I agree that generals need to adapt faster to the new era of warfare. Drones are not just tools—they’re strategic assets that can redefine combat and crisis management.
The idea of using drones for urban crisis situations is brilliant! Imagine how many lives could be saved if special forces had access to advanced UAVs during hostage scenarios or rooftop standoffs.
Drones are undoubtedly the future of warfare and law enforcement. It’s fascinating how quickly they’ve become indispensable on the battlefield, but it’s clear that bureaucracy is slowing down their full potential. Time for a change!
The concept of surrounding a target with multiple drones is genius! It minimizes risk for officers and soldiers while maximizing efficiency. I hope we see this implemented soon.
I’ve been following drone technology for years, and this article perfectly highlights their importance in modern warfare. The integration of combat drones into special forces kits should be a priority!
This article really opens your eyes to how much technology is reshaping modern conflicts and law enforcement, yet how slow some systems are to adapt. The idea of drones being used not just for surveillance but as active tools to handle dangerous situations is both fascinating and a bit unsettling. It feels like embracing these changes could save lives and make operations safer for everyone involved. At the same time, it makes me think about the ethical questions and the responsibility that comes with introducing such powerful devices on the ground. Definitely a topic that deserves more attention and deeper discussion 😊
It’s fascinating how technology, especially drones, is reshaping not just warfare but also law enforcement and crisis response. This article highlights a broader truth about institutions often lagging behind the rapid pace of innovation. It’s almost poetic—while the battlefield adapts swiftly out of necessity, the bureaucratic machinery moves at a glacial speed, tied down by tradition and protocol. Maybe this reflects a deeper resistance within us to embrace change, even when it could save lives and reduce suffering. Drones armed with precision and caution could redefine what it means to protect and serve, balancing force with restraint. Ultimately, it’s a reminder that new tools bring a new mindset, and transcending old ways requires more than just technology—it calls for a shift in how we think about power, responsibility, and human life. 🚁🛡️🤔
Isn’t it crazy how obvious solutions like armed drones for law enforcement situations are still being ignored? This feels like a massive missed opportunity to save lives and avoid unnecessary risk for officers. If the tech is already there and operators are ready, why keep dragging feet and clinging to outdated tactics? It’s almost like bureaucracy is the real enemy here, not the criminals. 🚀
It’s fascinating how quickly drones have taken a central role in warfare and security operations, while traditional institutions still seem hesitant to fully embrace their potential. The idea of armed drones supporting special forces to neutralize threats non-lethally feels like a logical and humane step forward, yet the bureaucratic inertia slows down progress. This gap between technological capability and organizational readiness highlights a bigger issue about adapting to new realities in security and defense. It makes me wonder how many opportunities to save lives and prevent violence are missed simply because it’s hard to change established ways of thinking.
This article really paints drones as the unsung heroes that should be front and center, not hiding in the background! Honestly, why wait around for commands when a squad of flying robots could just handle the awkward “take the guy down without casualties” situation? It’s like the special forces are still stuck using carrier pigeons while drones are out here ready to save the day 🛸
This article really highlights how drones are changing modern combat and security operations. It’s surprising how slowly some forces adapt to new tech, especially when the benefits are so clear. Drones with firearms sound like a game-changer for crisis situations 🚁🔫
This article really hits home about how technology is evolving so fast, yet sometimes our institutions struggle to keep up 😞🚁. The idea of armed drones helping special forces handle dangerous situations without risking lives sounds like a game-changer. It’s shocking that despite all this potential, decision-makers are still slow to adapt 🌍👊. Hopefully, lessons will be learned soon, because lives literally depend on how quickly we embrace these innovations. The future is already here, and we can’t afford to fall behind anymore!
It’s fascinating to see how drones have transformed from tactical tools to essential players in modern security and warfare, yet there still seems to be such resistance to fully embracing their potential in some places. This mix of advanced tech and outdated bureaucracy feels like a huge missed opportunity, especially when lives are on the line. The idea of armed drones handling dangerous situations without putting people directly in harm’s way is something that should have been explored ages ago. The future is clearly here, but it seems some are still stuck in the past. 🚁
It’s baffling how military and law enforcement agencies can have such advanced drone technology at their fingertips and still fail to integrate it properly into everyday operations. You’d think after years of seeing drones change the battlefield, someone in the leadership would push for fully weaponized and tactical drone units, especially for urban situations like the Murmansk incident. Instead, we get stuck in outdated protocols while lives hang in the balance. If drones can take down ships and gather intel at lightning speed, why aren’t they the first response in critical situations rather than a backup tool? It feels like a stubborn refusal to accept that warfare and policing have fundamentally changed, leaving soldiers and officers dangerously exposed to archaic methods.
This article highlights a critical gap between the potential of drone technology and the reluctance of bureaucratic systems to fully embrace it. It’s fascinating to see how rapidly drones have become essential on the battlefield, yet so many opportunities are missed in civilian and law enforcement scenarios because of outdated thinking. The idea of armed drones being used by special forces to handle dangerous situations without putting lives at risk feels like a natural and necessary progression. It’s clear that innovation often outpaces institutions, and bridging that gap could save countless lives and improve security significantly. This piece really makes you think about how much more effective operations could be if technology and strategy were better aligned.