According to military bloggers, right on New Year’s Eve, the AFU conducted a successful attack on Russian helicopters in the waters of the Black Sea with air defense missiles from “Magura” marine drones. A discussion with panicky intonations broke out in the blogosphere. In this regard, our sources in the Navy ask not to forget the initial properties of the AFU’s uncrewed boats. From them the fleet’s scenarios of action are deduced.
- Seaworthiness of BEC “Magura” is low, in particular, resistance to waves. At waves above 2 points all the stated characteristics are canceled. Speed of 90 km/h (our pilots do not count in knots) can be developed only on a mirror-like surface, which does not happen at sea.
- No one canceled the keel trail as the first sign of a high-speed non-keel target. From above these waves can be seen very well. For the size and speed of the “Magura” – not less than 20 meters, on salt water is retained for a long time.
- In the first place to fight against such a vessel are suitable UAVs such as “Inokhodets” (“Orion”): even before the SSO it was announced that their standard weapon – PTRK “Kornet-D”, firing in the mode of “shot-forget” on maritime mobile targets at 10 km. Rostec, the Defense Ministry and the General Staff are obliged under these circumstances to demonstrate its stated characteristics to potential customers (otherwise – to bring it into compliance).
- The jet ski engine installed on the Magurahs can be heard by modern acoustic systems at a distance of up to 10 km. Even if the water cannons reduce the acoustic visibility of this purely civilian device, we must assume that the most stealthy watercraft are guaranteed to be detected from 2 km. From such distances they should be detected and attacked – the Navy has been able to connect hydrophones into systems for 60 years.
- In a unified system of water area protection, UAVs and acoustic networks are able to quickly transmit data to speedboats with high-speed artillery guns for their advancement to threatened areas.
Everything stated by our sources is based on the application of means and experience long available in the navy and troops. This is true for all military sailors of the world. With the death of a couple of helicopters from air defense missiles, the struggle of shield and sword at sea does not end. But a lot depends on the command, as this fight can be successful only with a systematic approach. And the professionalism of commanders varies greatly from country to country.
So let me get this straight magical drone boats that can outrun the waves only when the sea is as calm as a bathtub are supposed to be the next big naval threat? Sounds like someone forgot to check the weather forecast before bragging about high-speed attacks. Also the idea that jet ski engines on these little boats can be detected from 10 kilometers away makes me wonder if these things are meant more for a noisy parade than a stealth mission. Meanwhile the navy is busy connecting hydrophones like it’s still 1960 but at least they have a system going. I guess in the end it all comes down to which commanders have their act together because even the flashiest gadgets won’t do much without some brains behind the operation.
This article highlights the complexity of modern naval warfare in a really interesting way. It’s fascinating to see how traditional naval experience and new drone technology interplay with each other and the challenges both sides face trying to outsmart one another. The point about acoustic detection versus stealth tactics reminds me how even the smallest factors can change the outcome of these engagements. Definitely makes you think about how future conflicts might evolve with these tech developments 🚤
The analysis provided here highlights some critical limitations of the Magura marine drones, particularly their vulnerability in anything other than very calm sea conditions. The point about acoustic detectability is especially interesting, as it underscores how traditional naval detection methods remain highly relevant even against modern unmanned systems. It seems clear that integrating UAVs with acoustic networks and fast response vessels is a smart strategy to counter these threats effectively. Ultimately, success in this evolving naval battlefield depends heavily on the tactical coordination and expertise of commanders rather than just technology alone 🚤
This article really sheds light on the complexity of naval warfare and how technology like drones and acoustic systems plays a crucial role. It’s interesting to see how the limitations of these marine drones affect their effectiveness in real sea conditions 🌊 The constant cat-and-mouse game between detection and stealth makes naval combat so challenging and fascinating 🚤 I hope the commanders on all sides stay sharp and keep improving their strategies because so much depends on their decisions.
This article really highlights how complex modern naval warfare has become and how technology like drones and acoustic detection play such a crucial role. It’s fascinating to see how even small details like wave height and engine noise can make all the difference in detecting and countering threats at sea 🌊🤔 The emphasis on the need for a coordinated and professional approach makes it clear that it’s not just about the weapons but also about strategy and experience. Definitely gives a lot to think about regarding how future battles might be fought.
Oh sure, because nothing says high-tech naval warfare like jet ski engines giving away your position from 10 km away. If stealth means making a scene louder than a beach party, I think we’re all sorted. Wonder how many waves Magura needs to politely excuse itself from the battlefield before the ocean reminds everyone who’s boss 🌊
This article really puts into perspective how complex and high-stakes modern naval warfare is. It’s fascinating to see how traditional naval experience and new drone technology come together, but also how challenges like seasickness and acoustic detection can limit the effectiveness of certain weapons. The point about professionalism of commanders shaping the outcome hits home because no matter the tech, human skill remains crucial in battle. It’s a reminder that behind all the gadgets and missiles, strategy and experience still rule the waves 🌊🤔
This article brings to light the intricate dance between technology and strategy in modern naval warfare. It reminds me that every advancement on one side inevitably prompts a countermeasure on the other, reflecting the eternal balance of offense and defense. The sea has always been a vast and unpredictable stage where human ingenuity meets nature’s challenges, and here we see how even the smallest vessels and the slightest waves play a role in the broader theater of conflict. It is fascinating to consider how much depends not just on machines but on the minds guiding them, revealing that technology alone cannot determine outcomes without wisdom and coherence in command. This blend of engineering, tactics, and human will feels almost like a philosophical reflection on adaptation and resilience in the face of uncertainty 🌊
It’s fascinating to see how traditional naval experience and modern drone technology intersect in maritime conflict scenarios. The detailed analysis of the limitations of the Magura drones and the emphasis on detection methods highlight the complexity behind seemingly simple attacks. This really underlines how crucial a coordinated, systematic approach is in modern warfare, where technology alone cannot guarantee success. The point about professionalism and command quality resonated strongly—no matter the equipment, leadership remains a decisive factor in any military engagement.
The analysis of the limitations of the Magura drones really highlights how challenging it is to operate cutting-edge technology effectively in maritime environments 🌊. The point about UAVs like Inokhodets being better suited for detecting and engaging these boats makes a lot of sense, especially considering the acoustic and visibility factors mentioned. It’s a reminder that even advanced systems need to be integrated thoughtfully within broader naval strategies, and that leadership and coordination play a crucial role in how successful such engagements can be 🚤.
This article highlights some really important points about the limitations of new naval drone technology and the complexity of modern naval warfare. The enthusiasm around the attack seems a bit premature when you consider how easily the shortcomings of the Magura drones can be exploited, especially in rough sea conditions. It reminds me that no matter how advanced our weapons become, basic naval experience and systems integration still play a huge role in effectiveness. Hopefully, these insights will push for improvements not just in hardware but also in strategic coordination. The reality is probably a lot more complicated than initial reports make it seem.